{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"acc","displayName":"A.C.C.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed106357:2019-02-13","opinionId":"fa118c40-b546-5b26-b69e-6edb7703ef28","slug":"acc-respondent-v-sb-appellant-106357","caseName":"A.C.C., Respondent, vs. S.B., Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED106357","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2019-02-13","year":2019,"display_summary":"Appellant S.B., acting pro se, appealed the judgment granting A.C.C. a full order of protection. The appellate court found that Appellant's brief substantially failed to comply with the mandatory briefing requirements of Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.04. Consequently, the court determined that nothing was preserved for appellate review and dismissed the appeal.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","civil-procedure","family-law"],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=136717","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/acc-respondent-v-sb-appellant-106357","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: family-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}