{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"al","displayName":"A.L.","totalCases":3},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:doc-13048:undated","opinionId":"fd039d73-4549-5cd0-a89b-d1124ab4bbad","slug":"al-respondent-v-anthony-peeler-appellant-13048","caseName":"A.L., Respondent, v. Anthony Peeler, Appellant.","caseNumber":null,"court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":null,"year":1998,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13048","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/al-respondent-v-anthony-peeler-appellant-13048","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed101701:undated","opinionId":"05790307-0e9b-53e2-bd81-ae0e8a2e5a3e","slug":"emb-respondent-v-al-appellant-101701","caseName":"E.M.B., Respondent, vs. A.L., Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED101701","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":null,"year":2015,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"reversed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=86618","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/emb-respondent-v-al-appellant-101701","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:parent-229296","opinionId":"f6893bae-c6ae-52c0-a0d4-7d2ff898be61","slug":"in-the-interest-of-skj-all-all-and-al-juveniles-and-juvenile-officer-v-al-d87944","caseName":"In the Interest of: S.K.J., A.L.L., A.L.L., and A.L., Juveniles; and Juvenile Officer\nvs.\nA.L.","caseNumber":"WD87944","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2025,"display_summary":"Father appealed the termination of his parental rights to his three children, which the trial court based on four statutory grounds and a finding that termination was in the children's best interests. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, finding no error in the trial court's decision to terminate parental rights on the \"failure to rectify\" ground. The court also found that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that termination was in the children's best interests, rejecting Father's claims regarding imputed safety concerns and the \"better off in another home\" finding.","primaryTopic":"child-custody","topicSlugs":["child-custody","family-law","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review","civil-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=229296","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/in-the-interest-of-skj-all-all-and-al-juveniles-and-juvenile-officer-v-al-d87944","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}