{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"andre-mitchell","displayName":"Andre Mitchell","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed107953:2020-06-23","opinionId":"136c3254-380b-5416-953a-02a455752670","slug":"andre-mitchell-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-107953","caseName":"Andre Mitchell, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED107953","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2020-06-23","year":2020,"display_summary":"Andre Mitchell appealed the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, arguing his untimely filing should be excused due to third-party interference. The motion court dismissed his motion without an evidentiary hearing because it was filed one day late. The appellate court affirmed, holding that Mitchell waived his right to proceed under Rule 24.035 by failing to allege facts supporting the exception in his motions, and his counsel's actions did not constitute abandonment.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","appellate-procedure","civil-procedure","other"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=160536","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/andre-mitchell-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-107953","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":36,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","text: state of missouri","text: conviction"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}