{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"anthony-balbirnie","displayName":"Anthony Balbirnie","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd84667:2022-08-02","opinionId":"88e8cd26-bb86-562a-afe8-6b735cdf4bad","slug":"anthony-balbirnie-v-state-of-missouri-d84667","caseName":"Anthony Balbirnie \nvs. \nState of Missouri","caseNumber":"WD84667","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2022-08-02","year":2022,"display_summary":"Anthony Balbirnie appealed the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion, which alleged a Brady violation, multiple claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and that the State knowingly presented false evidence. The motion court denied relief after an evidentiary hearing. The appellate court affirmed the motion court's judgment, finding no clear error in its conclusions that no Brady violation occurred, counsel was not ineffective under Strickland, and the State did not knowingly present false evidence.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","appellate-procedure","evidence","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=188214","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/anthony-balbirnie-v-state-of-missouri-d84667","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":36,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","text: state of missouri","text: conviction"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}