{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"anthony-saucedo","displayName":"ANTHONY SAUCEDO","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappsd:sd37985:2024-03-06","opinionId":"98b1cc06-3c2f-504d-ad9c-3a387962939e","slug":"anthony-saucedo-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-d37985","caseName":"ANTHONY SAUCEDO, Appellant\nvs.\nSTATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent","caseNumber":"SD37985","court":"moappsd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District","decisionDate":"2024-03-06","year":2024,"display_summary":"Anthony Saucedo appealed his conviction for attempted second-degree assault against a law enforcement officer, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to prove specific intent to cause physical injury. The conviction stemmed from a high-speed vehicular pursuit where Saucedo intentionally collided with a deputy's patrol vehicle. The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, finding sufficient circumstantial evidence to support the finding of specific intent.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","other"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=206233","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/anthony-saucedo-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-d37985","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":38,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","text: state of missouri","text: conviction"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"}]}