{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"anthony-tate","displayName":"Anthony Tate","totalCases":2},"cases":[{"caseId":"mo:sc100676:2025-04-01","opinionId":"2959b34b-f724-5df1-b2bd-bbb72a8817ee","slug":"state-of-missouri-respondent-v-anthony-tate-appellant-100676","caseName":"State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Anthony Tate, Appellant.","caseNumber":"SC100676","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2025-04-01","year":2025,"display_summary":"Anthony Tate appealed his convictions for two counts of first-degree assault, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and alleging plain error by the circuit court. Tate contended the court erred by not issuing a corrective instruction regarding the State's closing argument and by not striking portions of a witness's testimony as inadmissible hearsay. The Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed the circuit court's judgment, finding sufficient evidence to support the assault convictions and no plain error in the unpreserved claims.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","evidence","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review","jury-instructions"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=219013","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-anthony-tate-appellant-100676","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":32,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed111626:2024-05-28","opinionId":"1a3f06e8-d4f7-560b-82fd-7a58cb7bc6ba","slug":"state-of-missouri-respondent-v-anthony-tate-appellant-111626","caseName":"State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Anthony Tate, Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED111626","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2024-05-28","year":2024,"display_summary":"Anthony Tate appealed his jury convictions for first-degree murder, assault, and weapon charges stemming from a drive-by shooting. The appellate court granted Points One and Two, finding the State failed to present sufficient evidence that two victims suffered \"serious physical injury\" to support class A felony first-degree assault convictions. The court denied Tate's plain error claims in Points Three and Four, concluding he did not demonstrate manifest injustice regarding the State's acquittal-first closing argument or a detective's alleged hearsay testimony. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment in part, reversed the class A felony assault convictions, entered class B felony assault convictions, and remanded for resentencing.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","evidence","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=209188","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-anthony-tate-appellant-111626","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":40,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}