{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"antoine-harrisapplewhite","displayName":"ANTOINE HARRIS-APPLEWHITE","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappsd:sd38254:2025-04-30","opinionId":"ed52de86-4886-5508-8d0e-c58d6dab6946","slug":"antoine-harris-applewhite-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-d38254","caseName":"ANTOINE HARRIS-APPLEWHITE, Appellant\nvs.\nSTATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent","caseNumber":"SD38254","court":"moappsd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District","decisionDate":"2025-04-30","year":2025,"display_summary":"Antoine Harris-Applewhite appealed the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion, alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel on three grounds. He claimed counsel failed to sever a firearm possession charge, failed to object to witness testimony suggesting threats, and failed to investigate other surveillance cameras. The motion court denied his claims, and the appellate court affirmed, finding no clear error in the motion court's judgment.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","appellate-procedure","evidence","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=220213","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/antoine-harris-applewhite-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-d38254","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":36,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","text: state of missouri","text: conviction"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}