{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"auguste-h-rohde","displayName":"AUGUSTE H. ROHDE","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappsd:sd38395:2024-10-17","opinionId":"99a9943e-05d8-564c-ae10-7c297294e0ea","slug":"state-of-missouri-respondent-v-auguste-h-rohde-appellant-d38395","caseName":"STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent\nv.\nAUGUSTE H. ROHDE, Appellant","caseNumber":"SD38395","court":"moappsd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District","decisionDate":"2024-10-17","year":2024,"display_summary":"Auguste H. Rohde appealed his conviction for possessing a forging instrumentality. Rohde was found with a squeeze bottle containing yellow liquid after being ordered to submit a urine sample for a drug test, a device commonly used to subvert such tests. On appeal, Rohde argued the evidence was insufficient to prove he had the purpose of committing forgery. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, finding that the circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences were sufficient for the jury to conclude Rohde possessed the item with the intent to commit forgery.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","evidence","other"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=213733","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-auguste-h-rohde-appellant-d38395","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":38,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","text: state of missouri","text: conviction"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}