{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"candice-r-gillam","displayName":"Candice R. Gillam","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed109711:2022-02-15","opinionId":"54dab9de-26e2-587d-8b64-7c9f945b9e06","slug":"candice-r-gillam-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-109711","caseName":"Candice R. Gillam, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED109711","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2022-02-15","year":2022,"display_summary":"Candice R. Gillam appealed the denial of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, arguing her convictions for possession of a controlled substance and first-degree endangering the welfare of a child violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. She contended that possession was a lesser-included offense of child endangerment. The appellate court affirmed the motion court's judgment, concluding that under the \"same elements test,\" the two offenses are not lesser-included and therefore do not constitute multiple punishments for the same offense.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","appellate-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=184400","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/candice-r-gillam-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-109711","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":36,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","text: state of missouri","text: conviction"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}