{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"cedric-dewaynne-mack","displayName":"Cedric Dewaynne Mack","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd80719:2018-08-14","opinionId":"bcc4f709-1c31-5404-a5df-393f9e2a8bae","slug":"state-of-missouri-v-cedric-dewaynne-mack-d80719","caseName":"State of Missouri\nvs.\nCedric Dewaynne Mack","caseNumber":"WD80719","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2018-08-14","year":2018,"display_summary":"Cedric Dewaynne Mack appealed his conviction for driving while intoxicated, arguing the trial court erred by admitting his statements about drinking and a beer can in his car. Mack contended these statements were made during custodial interrogation before he received Miranda warnings, violating his privilege against self-incrimination. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, holding that even if the admission of the statements was erroneous, it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because the statements were cumulative of overwhelming other evidence of intoxication.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","evidence","search-and-seizure"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=129033","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-v-cedric-dewaynne-mack-d80719","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":38,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","topic: search-and-seizure","text: state of missouri","text: conviction"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}