{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"charles-k-king","displayName":"Charles K. King","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed108951:2021-05-04","opinionId":"0136cff5-81b0-527e-8997-30f09838e2af","slug":"state-of-missouri-respondent-v-charles-k-king-appellant-108951","caseName":"State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles K. King, Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED108951","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2021-05-04","year":2021,"display_summary":"Charles K. King appealed his convictions for four counts of forcible rape and one count of forcible sodomy following a bench trial. He challenged the trial court's interpretation of the statutes regarding voluntary intoxication, the sufficiency of the State's evidence on physical force and timeframe, the denial of his motion to dismiss the information, and the admissibility of video evidence. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no error in the statutory interpretation, sufficiency of evidence, or evidentiary rulings.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","evidence","standard-of-review","appellate-procedure","other"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=177127","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-charles-k-king-appellant-108951","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":32,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}