{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"christal-allen","displayName":"Christal Allen","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd86536:undated","opinionId":"cc9a8ba5-3d3b-5799-aa8d-fdbd4674fd5e","slug":"christal-allen-v-xf-enterprise-corp-d86536","caseName":"Christal Allen\nvs.\nX&F Enterprise Corp.","caseNumber":"WD86536","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2024,"display_summary":"Christal Allen obtained a default judgment against X & F Enterprise Corp. in 2011. Ten years later, X & F Enterprise sought a declaratory judgment that the 2011 judgment was satisfied under section 516.350, but the court equitably tolled the ten-year period due to X & F Enterprise's conduct. X & F Enterprise then appealed the revival court's order reviving the 2011 judgment, arguing the tolling court lacked jurisdiction and the revival order was improper. The appellate court affirmed, holding that X & F Enterprise's arguments constituted an impermissible collateral attack on the unappealed tolling judgment and that collateral estoppel barred relitigation of the tolling issue.","primaryTopic":"civil-procedure","topicSlugs":["civil-procedure","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=209475","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/christal-allen-v-xf-enterprise-corp-d86536","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}