{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"christopher-stephens-ford-defendant","displayName":"CHRISTOPHER STEPHENS FORD, Defendant-","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappsd:sd37278:2022-09-06","opinionId":"a6bd49c4-d57e-5591-a801-601c14d00839","slug":"state-of-missouri-plaintiff-respondent-v-christopher-stephens-ford-defend-d37278","caseName":"STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent\nv.\nCHRISTOPHER STEPHENS FORD, Defendant-Appellant","caseNumber":"SD37278","court":"moappsd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District","decisionDate":"2022-09-06","year":2022,"display_summary":"Christopher Stephens Ford appealed his convictions for second-degree robbery and resisting arrest, arguing the circuit court plainly erred by allowing the prosecutor to cross-examine him using a Dollar General website. The appellate court denied plain-error review. It found that Ford failed to establish substantial grounds for believing the alleged error resulted in a manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice, and therefore affirmed the circuit court's judgment.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","appellate-procedure","evidence"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=188955","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-plaintiff-respondent-v-christopher-stephens-ford-defend-d37278","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":32,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}