{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri","displayName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri","totalCases":59},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd85602:2023-09-12","opinionId":"148ad3d6-b1fa-5885-bab8-465aa1a1d53a","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-occupational-health-centers-of-the-southwe-d85602","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri\nvs.\nOccupational Health Centers of the Southwest, P.C., d/b/a Concentra Medical Centers","caseNumber":"WD85602","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2023-09-12","year":2023,"display_summary":"The City of Kansas City sought contractual indemnity from Concentra Medical Centers for costs incurred in an employment discrimination lawsuit against the City. The circuit court granted summary judgment to Concentra, finding that the contractual indemnity provisions, as modified by Concentra's proposal and an additional insured endorsement, did not obligate Concentra to indemnify the City for liability arising from the City's own actions. The appellate court affirmed, concluding that the City's liability in the underlying discrimination case stemmed solely from its own conduct, not from Concentra's actions.","primaryTopic":"contracts","topicSlugs":["contracts","summary-judgment","civil-procedure","insurance","employment-law"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=200974","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-occupational-health-centers-of-the-southwe-d85602","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"},{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":18,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"},{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd84464:2022-02-15","opinionId":"eecc6cce-abf1-540f-8c9e-bca65461d07f","slug":"b-richest-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d84464","caseName":"B. Richest\nvs. \nCity of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD84464","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2022-02-15","year":2022,"display_summary":"B. Richest appealed the dismissal of his whistleblower claim against the City of Kansas City, Missouri, which alleged he was terminated for reporting a supervisor's policy violation. The trial court granted the City's motion to dismiss, finding the claim time-barred by the one-year statute of limitations. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that it was not clear from the face of the petition whether the Human Resources Board's decision upholding Richest's termination constituted a \"disciplinary action\" under the whistleblower statute, thus precluding dismissal on statute of limitations grounds at this stage.","primaryTopic":"employment-law","topicSlugs":["employment-law","civil-procedure","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=184355","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/b-richest-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d84464","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":32,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd84195:2021-12-21","opinionId":"aa705d1e-3028-5340-82da-ae20a0e60eac","slug":"kc-air-cargo-services-inc-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d84195","caseName":"K.C. Air Cargo Services, Inc.\nvs. \nCity of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD84195","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2021-12-21","year":2021,"display_summary":"K.C. Air Cargo Services, Inc. (KCACS) and the City of Kansas City, Missouri, were in a dispute over the rental rate for a renewed lease of airport property, specifically whether an appraisal was required to determine the fair market value of land and improvements. The City appealed the circuit court's grant of summary judgment in favor of KCACS on both KCACS's petition and the City's counterclaim for declaratory judgment. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the issues regarding the rental rate calculation and the inclusion of improvements were previously litigated and decided, thus issue preclusion applied.","primaryTopic":"contracts","topicSlugs":["contracts","civil-procedure","summary-judgment","property-real-estate","appellate-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=182770","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/kc-air-cargo-services-inc-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d84195","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":32,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"},{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:parent-182762","opinionId":"ae6891d7-3789-5911-8a36-45fa9f994ca0","slug":"ronald-williams-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d83835","caseName":"Ronald Williams\nvs. \nCity of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD83835","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2021-12-21","year":2021,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=182762","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/ronald-williams-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d83835","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"mo:sc97712:2020-05-12","opinionId":"ca648deb-0d8a-5193-ab05-359ed5001b9d","slug":"jl-wilson-respondent-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-c97712","caseName":"J.L. Wilson, Respondent, vs. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Appellant.","caseNumber":"SC97712","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2020-05-12","year":2020,"display_summary":"J.L. Wilson sued the City of Kansas City for disability discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act after his employment was terminated due to a permanent work restriction. The circuit court entered judgment for Wilson, including an award of litigation expenses. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed the judgment on the discrimination claim, finding the City's objection to certain evidence was not preserved. However, the Court reversed the award of litigation expenses, clarifying that while such expenses are not \"court costs\" under the MHRA, they may be recoverable as \"reasonable attorney fees\" if they are reasonable out-of-pocket expenses normally charged to a fee-paying client. The case was remanded for a determination of these fees and appellate costs.","primaryTopic":"employment-law","topicSlugs":["employment-law","civil-procedure","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review","other"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=156474","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/jl-wilson-respondent-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-c97712","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":38,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"mo:sc97626:2019-10-15","opinionId":"24d61c49-306b-5bd8-b1c5-3d269eefcef8","slug":"sophian-plaza-association-et-al-respondents-v-city-of-kansas-city-missour-c97626","caseName":"Sophian Plaza Association, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Appellant.","caseNumber":"SC97626","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2019-10-15","year":2019,"display_summary":"Sophian Plaza Association and a class of plaintiffs sued the City of Kansas City after the City terminated its trash rebate program, alleging breach of injunction, breach of contract, specific performance, and civil contempt. The circuit court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, but the Missouri Supreme Court reversed. The Court held that the breach of contract claim was not viable because the underlying agreement had merged into a 1976 Modified Judgment. Furthermore, the Court found that the current class could not bring a civil contempt action to enforce the 1976 judgment because they were not parties to the original litigation, and the original plaintiffs were not certified as a class under Rule 52.08.","primaryTopic":"civil-procedure","topicSlugs":["civil-procedure","contracts"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=145514","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/sophian-plaza-association-et-al-respondents-v-city-of-kansas-city-missour-c97626","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"},{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":16,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd81339:2019-03-05","opinionId":"bf5dd6ad-fc9f-566d-86f7-65a2ffbdd8e5","slug":"natalie-mckinney-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d81339","caseName":"Natalie McKinney\nvs.\nCity of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD81339","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2019-03-05","year":2019,"display_summary":"Ms. Natalie McKinney sued the City of Kansas City, Missouri, alleging a hostile work environment under the Missouri Human Rights Act. A jury awarded her damages, and the City appealed, arguing insufficient evidence and improper admission of \"me-too\" testimony. The appellate court affirmed the jury's verdict, finding the evidence sufficient to support the hostile work-environment claim and that the City failed to preserve its objection to the \"me-too\" testimony, which was not plain error. The court also granted Ms. McKinney's motion for attorney fees on appeal and remanded for their determination.","primaryTopic":"employment-law","topicSlugs":["employment-law","civil-procedure","evidence","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=137534","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/natalie-mckinney-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d81339","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":32,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd81671:2019-02-13","opinionId":"f2e7af00-026a-5d5e-bd64-0e088474ce45","slug":"tarshish-jones-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d81671","caseName":"Tarshish Jones\nvs.\nCity of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD81671","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2019-02-13","year":2019,"display_summary":"Tarshish Jones, an African-American firefighter, sued the City of Kansas City for race discrimination under the MHRA, alleging he was unfairly denied promotion to captain due to a biased scoring process. A jury found in favor of Jones, awarding damages and attorneys' fees. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, rejecting the City's arguments regarding the timeliness of Jones's administrative complaint, the admissibility and exclusion of expert testimony, and the calculation of attorneys' fees against a sovereign entity. The case was remanded solely for the determination of additional attorneys' fees incurred on appeal and post-judgment.","primaryTopic":"employment-law","topicSlugs":["employment-law","civil-procedure","evidence","appellate-procedure","governmental-immunity"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=138853","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/tarshish-jones-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d81671","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":36,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd80985:2018-02-27","opinionId":"487c2495-0de1-5781-9dcd-a32742b5e53a","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-bego-cosic-d80985","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri\nvs.\nBego Cosic","caseNumber":"WD80985","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2018-02-27","year":2018,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=123004","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-bego-cosic-d80985","relatedPracticeAreas":[],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd78667:2016-03-08","opinionId":"a463bb8e-eccb-534f-a70d-ef5c95dbd595","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-kevin-garnett-d78667","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri\nvs.\nKevin Garnett","caseNumber":"WD78667","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2016-03-08","year":2016,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"reversed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=98333","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-kevin-garnett-d78667","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd78035:2016-02-02","opinionId":"5f31337c-f320-580a-ae11-1a52e572970e","slug":"timothy-walsh-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d78035","caseName":"Timothy Walsh\nvs.\nCity of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD78035","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2016-02-02","year":2016,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=96815","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/timothy-walsh-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d78035","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd77211:2015-05-19","opinionId":"4fba9536-99c6-5929-88b0-06de48d94a8a","slug":"pamela-randel-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d77211","caseName":"Pamela Randel\nvs.\nCity of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD77211","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2015-05-19","year":2015,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"reversed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=86634","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/pamela-randel-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d77211","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd77600:2014-12-23","opinionId":"d992a5b4-a4a2-5e58-b1e2-502d64cc79ec","slug":"paula-diane-robinson-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d77600","caseName":"Paula Diane Robinson\nvs.\nCity of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD77600","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2014-12-23","year":2014,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=81979","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/paula-diane-robinson-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d77600","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:parent-81173","opinionId":"23db0b5f-0df6-5cb8-b6a2-860e0c687319","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-telester-ameena-powell-d76861","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri\nvs.\nTelester Ameena Powell","caseNumber":"WD76861","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2014-10-07","year":2014,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=81173","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-telester-ameena-powell-d76861","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd76824:2014-08-05","opinionId":"b98173b9-baa9-57f5-b97b-f07e4d6c75df","slug":"diana-crouch-et-al-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d76824","caseName":"Diana Crouch, et al\nvs.\nCity of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD76824","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2014-08-05","year":2014,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=76417","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/diana-crouch-et-al-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d76824","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd76864:2014-05-06","opinionId":"8daab26c-9700-5aa8-b8b4-ab5650227852","slug":"mark-kershaw-et-al-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d76864","caseName":"Mark Kershaw, et al\nvs.\nCity of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD76864","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2014-05-06","year":2014,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=73114","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/mark-kershaw-et-al-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d76864","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"mo:sc93195:2014-02-04","opinionId":"9f70c360-7ab7-556d-83a8-924229f2c1d8","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-karen-chastain-et-al-appellants-c93195","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent vs. Karen Chastain, et al., Appellants.","caseNumber":"SC93195","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2014-02-04","year":2014,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=69838","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-karen-chastain-et-al-appellants-c93195","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd75029:2013-01-15","opinionId":"81becb54-6d32-5663-ac6b-a2fa15bb6142","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-karen-chastain-et-al-d75029","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri vs. Karen Chastain, et al","caseNumber":"WD75029","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2013-01-15","year":2013,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=59270","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-karen-chastain-et-al-d75029","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd74364:2012-08-07","opinionId":"57479964-73c6-5767-8380-89cc77014d98","slug":"dave-mcneill-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d74364","caseName":"Dave McNeill vs. City of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD74364","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2012-08-07","year":2012,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=55943","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/dave-mcneill-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d74364","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd74287:2012-05-29","opinionId":"222fdd10-b4de-5ff4-ad48-9435df026d8b","slug":"angela-phelps-et-al-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d74287","caseName":"Angela Phelps, et al vs. City of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD74287","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2012-05-29","year":2012,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=54496","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/angela-phelps-et-al-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d74287","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd72208:2011-02-15","opinionId":"b7bd6383-ea3a-53a2-acc2-ec1e390dd2a9","slug":"kathleen-kline-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d72208","caseName":"Kathleen Kline vs. City of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD72208","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2011-02-15","year":2011,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=44420","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/kathleen-kline-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d72208","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"mo:sc90762:2011-01-25","opinionId":"0e1f1a60-3c31-5b4c-b19c-590deafda9b2","slug":"melissa-howard-respondent-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-c90762","caseName":"Melissa Howard, Respondent vs. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Appellant.","caseNumber":"SC90762","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2011-01-25","year":2011,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=43942","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/melissa-howard-respondent-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-c90762","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd72198:2010-10-26","opinionId":"e52e740b-812a-595a-a977-bdd33047cf91","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-georgia-j-carlson-d72198","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri vs. Georgia J. Carlson","caseNumber":"WD72198","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2010-10-26","year":2010,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=41924","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-georgia-j-carlson-d72198","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd69803:2010-02-09","opinionId":"5d931953-a874-5bb9-8f27-6e5ac53159f5","slug":"melissa-howard-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d69803","caseName":"Melissa Howard vs. City of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD69803","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2010-02-09","year":2010,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=36934","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/melissa-howard-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d69803","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd70576:2009-06-23","opinionId":"474324c6-bd8f-52f8-a6ce-cae5bd0b1fd8","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-georgia-j-carlson-d70576","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri vs. Georgia J. Carlson","caseNumber":"WD70576","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2009-06-23","year":2009,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=32827","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-georgia-j-carlson-d70576","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd69866:2009-04-07","opinionId":"e3e0613b-9f92-5f2e-bd32-caa9cc84675a","slug":"sharry-mcdonald-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d69866","caseName":"Sharry McDonald vs. City of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD69866","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2009-04-07","year":2009,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=30871","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/sharry-mcdonald-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d69866","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd68653:2009-01-20","opinionId":"f41ac799-9767-5b3e-b3b4-e13e4afd9c0f","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-william-heather-d68653","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri vs. William Heather","caseNumber":"WD68653","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2009-01-20","year":2009,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"vacated","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=28686","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-william-heather-d68653","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:doc-17921:undated","opinionId":"36711229-3d83-52ff-aa14-659938a14ab5","slug":"mostafa-rabiee-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-17921","caseName":"Mostafa Rabiee, Appellant, v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent.","caseNumber":null,"court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":1997,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17921","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/mostafa-rabiee-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-17921","relatedPracticeAreas":[],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd67734:undated","opinionId":"5bbf9b19-4060-56af-be7b-eb4ee2b6cb19","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-kelly-long-appellant-d67734","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent, v. Kelly Long, Appellant.","caseNumber":"WD67734","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2008,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=21709","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-kelly-long-appellant-d67734","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd67675:undated","opinionId":"fff06f88-7a7b-583d-955d-692c5e870bea","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-terry-dudley-appellant-d67675","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent, v. Terry Dudley, Appellant.","caseNumber":"WD67675","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2008,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=21701","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-terry-dudley-appellant-d67675","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd67485:undated","opinionId":"59e4996c-014c-5735-817a-cfec07f269cc","slug":"umb-bank-na-respondent-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-d67485","caseName":"UMB Bank, NA., Respondent v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Appellant.","caseNumber":"WD67485","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2007,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=21564","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/umb-bank-na-respondent-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-d67485","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd66618:undated","opinionId":"1fb094b8-511e-5da0-8136-b759dd51681b","slug":"building-owners-managers-association-of-greater-kansas-city-et-al-respond-d66618","caseName":"Building Owners & Managers Association of Greater Kansas City, et al., Respondent, v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Appellant.","caseNumber":"WD66618","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2007,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"remanded","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=22056","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/building-owners-managers-association-of-greater-kansas-city-et-al-respond-d66618","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd66338:undated","opinionId":"322aacbc-738f-56ab-85fd-a7a7d575e642","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-frederick-mcgary-appellant-d66338","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent, v. Frederick McGary, Appellant.","caseNumber":"WD66338","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2006,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=21833","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-frederick-mcgary-appellant-d66338","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd64388:undated","opinionId":"b4fcd1ad-4c77-53ea-b3b8-8893a59c7de2","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-jimmy-jordan-appellant-d64388","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent v. Jimmy Jordan, Appellant.","caseNumber":"WD64388","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2005,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=20003","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-jimmy-jordan-appellant-d64388","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd61942:undated","opinionId":"e8469c94-2741-59e7-b356-5555511cb26c","slug":"anna-miller-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-d61942","caseName":"Anna Miller, Appellant v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent","caseNumber":"WD61942","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2003,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=20040","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/anna-miller-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-d61942","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd61928:undated","opinionId":"f740efa1-a743-5b60-acd2-c6e1b9804766","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-robert-l-woodson-appellant-d61928","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent v. Robert L. Woodson, Appellant.","caseNumber":"WD61928","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2004,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=20034","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-robert-l-woodson-appellant-d61928","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd61294:undated","opinionId":"dad66fff-318b-5ccb-bbe3-703678946808","slug":"emet-dangerfield-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-d61294","caseName":"Emet Dangerfield, Appellant v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent.","caseNumber":"WD61294","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2003,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=20438","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/emet-dangerfield-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-d61294","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd60818:undated","opinionId":"56508360-2dc2-5b55-ba2b-babd369b891d","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-new-york-kansas-building-associ-d60818","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent v. New York-Kansas Building Associates, L.P., Appellant","caseNumber":"WD60818","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2002,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=19955","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-new-york-kansas-building-associ-d60818","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd78207:undated","opinionId":"2dae1eca-3449-5cb8-8a0c-56ec9fe16a97","slug":"wct-d-llc-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d78207","caseName":"WCT & D, LLC vs. City of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD78207","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2015,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"reversed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=94756","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/wct-d-llc-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d78207","relatedPracticeAreas":[],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd60564:undated","opinionId":"ace2f007-6ae5-587e-8dcf-d51a746eb06f","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-timothy-piercy-appellant-d60564","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent v. Timothy Piercy, Appellant.","caseNumber":"WD60564","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2002,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=20697","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-timothy-piercy-appellant-d60564","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd79073:undated","opinionId":"565e4a33-3940-5057-b53b-98e4f2a6cb66","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-daniel-j-ross-d79073","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri\nvs.\nDaniel J. Ross","caseNumber":"WD79073","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2017,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=109154","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-daniel-j-ross-d79073","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd80678:undated","opinionId":"9be12b0f-16ae-50ba-a1f4-bada88dca94b","slug":"sophian-plaza-association-et-al-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d80678","caseName":"Sophian Plaza Association, et al\nvs.\nCity of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD80678","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2018,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=132894","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/sophian-plaza-association-et-al-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d80678","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd60554:undated","opinionId":"b58509cb-8ab8-5cf5-8d37-6c7a83073454","slug":"dean-realty-company-respondent-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-d60554","caseName":"Dean Realty Company, Respondent, v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Appellant.","caseNumber":"WD60554","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2002,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=20696","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/dean-realty-company-respondent-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-d60554","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd60046:undated","opinionId":"2c8aff8b-ed9c-5075-88db-32e9fa596184","slug":"larry-and-judy-thomas-et-al-appellants-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-res-d60046","caseName":"Larry and Judy Thomas, et al., Appellants, v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent, City of Raytown, Missouri, Respondent.","caseNumber":"WD60046","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2002,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=19195","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/larry-and-judy-thomas-et-al-appellants-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-res-d60046","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd59983:undated","opinionId":"435dd72d-627b-5e98-a743-88ef9ce0282b","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-v-southwest-tracor-inc-et-al-respo-d59983","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri, Appellant, v. Southwest Tracor Inc., et al., Respondent.","caseNumber":"WD59983","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2002,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=19058","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-v-southwest-tracor-inc-et-al-respo-d59983","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd56405:undated","opinionId":"1eb00bb1-9231-5072-9cb9-c22bf9ebf553","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-orlo-k-hudson-appellant-d56405","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent, v. Orlo K. Hudson, Appellant.","caseNumber":"WD56405","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2000,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=19691","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-orlo-k-hudson-appellant-d56405","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd56182:undated","opinionId":"43af2e47-3cbd-5c27-a1d3-53664df04180","slug":"environmental-protection-inspection-and-consulting-inc-appellantcross-res-d56182","caseName":"Environmental Protection, Inspection and Consulting, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent/Cross-Appellant.","caseNumber":"WD56182","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2000,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=19617","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/environmental-protection-inspection-and-consulting-inc-appellantcross-res-d56182","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:doc-18699:undated","opinionId":"1900cf54-c333-5f4d-86ac-64bb6c41c8a7","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-v-joseph-arthur-et-al-respondent-18699","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri, Appellant, v. Joseph Arthur, et al., Respondent.","caseNumber":null,"court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":1999,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"reversed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=18699","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-v-joseph-arthur-et-al-respondent-18699","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd85851:undated","opinionId":"f8b7085c-56f2-5011-badb-1e467b8a6f35","slug":"jeanne-johnson-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d85851","caseName":"Jeanne Johnson\nvs.\nCity of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD85851","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2024,"display_summary":"Jeanne Johnson sued the City of Kansas City for disability discrimination and retaliation under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA), securing a jury verdict in her favor. The City appealed, raising four points concerning judicial estoppel, a refused verdict form, the submission of future economic losses, and the denial of remittitur. The Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, affirmed the judgment, finding no abuse of discretion in declining to apply judicial estoppel and no prejudice from the alleged instructional errors due to the application of a statutory damage cap. The court also sustained Johnson's motion for attorney's fees on appeal and remanded the case for their determination.","primaryTopic":"employment-law","topicSlugs":["employment-law","civil-procedure","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=207622","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/jeanne-johnson-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d85851","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":38,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd87219:undated","opinionId":"2d89988f-9785-53e2-92ab-fa85a06076aa","slug":"shahidah-hazziez-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d87219","caseName":"Shahidah Hazziez\nvs.\nCity of Kansas City, Missouri","caseNumber":"WD87219","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2025,"display_summary":"Shahidah Hazziez sued the City of Kansas City for retaliation and discrimination, obtaining a jury verdict in her favor. The circuit court subsequently granted the City's motion for a new trial, citing an improper jury instruction (Instruction 15) and improper closing argument regarding damages. On appeal, the Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, affirmed the circuit court's order for a new trial, finding that Instruction 15 was indeed improper, misleading, and prejudicial to the City.","primaryTopic":"jury-instructions","topicSlugs":["jury-instructions","civil-procedure","appellate-procedure","employment-law","evidence"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=228553","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/shahidah-hazziez-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-d87219","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":16,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"mo:sc82174:undated","opinionId":"6d8d7e48-d9e4-5e61-840c-5703c382494a","slug":"larry-jones-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-c82174","caseName":"Larry Jones, Appellant, v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent.","caseNumber":"SC82174","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":null,"year":2000,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=25527","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/larry-jones-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-c82174","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"mo:sc86741:undated","opinionId":"18dbb89f-9001-5f04-b582-aad4347fab74","slug":"furlong-companies-inc-respondent-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-c86741","caseName":"Furlong Companies, Inc., Respondent v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Appellant.","caseNumber":"SC86741","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":null,"year":2006,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=25559","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/furlong-companies-inc-respondent-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-c86741","relatedPracticeAreas":[],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:doc-18630:undated","opinionId":"8353cc5d-0734-54f1-abed-c6009fcbd3a1","slug":"larry-jones-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-18630","caseName":"Larry Jones, Appellant, v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent.","caseNumber":null,"court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":1999,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=18630","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/larry-jones-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-18630","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:doc-18306:undated","opinionId":"4f0cf21a-2053-5e20-b267-e57e86ec1efe","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-v-stephen-hon-et-al-respondent-unb-18306","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri, Appellant, v. Stephen Hon., et al., Respondent, Unborn and Unknown Heirs, Respondent.","caseNumber":null,"court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":1998,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=18306","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-appellant-v-stephen-hon-et-al-respondent-unb-18306","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"mo:sc95368:undated","opinionId":"294b20a0-2705-57c7-831a-b703461dc741","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-kansas-city-board-of-election-c-c95368","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent, vs. Kansas City Board of Election Commissioners, et al., Defendants, Rev. Samuel E. Mann, et al., Appellants.","caseNumber":"SC95368","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":null,"year":2017,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"reversed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=109054","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-kansas-city-board-of-election-c-c95368","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:doc-18099:undated","opinionId":"085df295-6107-5583-881d-336b030fb38d","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-woodswether-development-appella-18099","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent, v. Woodswether Development, Appellant.","caseNumber":null,"court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":1998,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=18099","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-woodswether-development-appella-18099","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd69436:undated","opinionId":"718aa01a-3c4b-53e5-a48f-5ebb20aa2135","slug":"billy-g-skaggs-et-al-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-d69436","caseName":"Billy G. Skaggs, et al., Appellant, v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent","caseNumber":"WD69436","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2008,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=21649","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/billy-g-skaggs-et-al-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-d69436","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:doc-17999:undated","opinionId":"c4da7fd2-0972-55fa-962a-4bc9ddd4414a","slug":"fred-wilkinson-jr-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-17999","caseName":"Fred Wilkinson, Jr., Appellant, v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent.","caseNumber":null,"court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":1997,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17999","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/fred-wilkinson-jr-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-17999","relatedPracticeAreas":[],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd69807:undated","opinionId":"6f5dfee1-0bcd-5ecd-8885-8154a3722c68","slug":"city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-chung-hoe-kue-et-al-randall-landes-d69807","caseName":"City of Kansas City, Missouri vs. Chung Hoe Kue, et al; Randall Landes","caseNumber":"WD69807","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2009,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=29499","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-v-chung-hoe-kue-et-al-randall-landes-d69807","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"insurance-bad-faith","label":"Insurance Bad Faith","href":"/practice-areas/insurance-bad-faith","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/insurance-bad-faith"}],"role":"appellant"}]}