{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"city-of-st-louis-missouri-et-al","displayName":"City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al.","totalCases":2},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed107679:2020-06-23","opinionId":"df5f0f30-09e1-5625-bfe7-369a9987b0cf","slug":"ronell-johnson-appellant-v-city-of-st-louis-missouri-et-al-respondents-107679","caseName":"Ronell Johnson, Appellant, v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al., Respondents.","caseNumber":"ED107679","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2020-06-23","year":2020,"display_summary":"Ronell Johnson, an African-American police officer, appealed from a trial court's judgment entering a directed verdict for Lieutenant Colonel Lawrence O'Toole and a jury verdict for the City of St. Louis and other respondents on his claims of race discrimination, disability discrimination, and retaliation under the MHRA. Johnson challenged the trial court's rulings on closing argument misstatements, the directed verdict, exclusion of comparator evidence, and refusal to submit punitive damages. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no prejudice from the closing argument error or the directed verdict, and no abuse of discretion in the evidentiary ruling.","primaryTopic":"employment-law","topicSlugs":["employment-law","civil-procedure","evidence","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=160534","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/ronell-johnson-appellant-v-city-of-st-louis-missouri-et-al-respondents-107679","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":38,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: employment","topic: employment-law","text: discrimination","text: retaliation"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed90774:2008-11-25","opinionId":"5d2c7871-1059-5336-a2f5-648847f88567","slug":"timothy-schwartz-respondent-v-city-of-st-louis-missouri-et-al-appellants-d90774","caseName":"Timothy Schwartz, Respondent, v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al., Appellants.","caseNumber":"ED90774","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2008-11-25","year":2008,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"reinstated","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=27067","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/timothy-schwartz-respondent-v-city-of-st-louis-missouri-et-al-appellants-d90774","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: employment"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"appellant"}]}