{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"claymont-development-llc","displayName":"Claymont Development, LLC","totalCases":2},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed112720:2025-06-24","opinionId":"cf0c62ea-1f2d-5fb0-9db8-30ab301d1a6d","slug":"claymont-development-llc-appellant-v-city-of-wildwood-respondent-112720","caseName":"Claymont Development, LLC, Appellant, vs. City of Wildwood, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED112720","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2025-06-24","year":2025,"display_summary":"Claymont Development, LLC appealed the dismissal of its petition challenging the constitutionality of zoning ordinances enacted by the City of Wildwood, which subjected its property to additional development regulations. The trial court had dismissed the petition, concluding the claims were not ripe for adjudication. The appellate court reversed, holding that Claymont's constitutional challenges to the ordinances were ripe, as the ordinances directly impacted its development plans and presented predominantly legal questions with fully developed historical facts.","primaryTopic":"property-real-estate","topicSlugs":["property-real-estate","civil-procedure","appellate-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=221536","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/claymont-development-llc-appellant-v-city-of-wildwood-respondent-112720","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: property-real-estate"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"},{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":4,"source":"text","evidence":["text: llc"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed112285:2024-08-20","opinionId":"c641001c-4066-5926-a28c-f1d34a564332","slug":"claymont-development-llc-appellant-v-patricia-thibeault-et-al-respondents-112285","caseName":"Claymont Development, LLC, Appellant, vs. Patricia Thibeault, et al., Respondents.","caseNumber":"ED112285","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2024-08-20","year":2024,"display_summary":"Claymont Development, LLC, sought injunctive and declaratory relief against the City of Wildwood regarding development moratoria and to compel the issuance of development permits for a residential subdivision. The trial court granted summary judgment for the City. On appeal, the Eastern District affirmed, holding that Claymont's claims were moot because the challenged moratoria had expired or been repealed, and the development plan had changed without proper resubmission, making it impossible for the court to grant effectual relief.","primaryTopic":"property-real-estate","topicSlugs":["property-real-estate","civil-procedure","summary-judgment","administrative-law","appellate-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=210478","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/claymont-development-llc-appellant-v-patricia-thibeault-et-al-respondents-112285","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":20,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: family-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"},{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: property-real-estate"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: summary-judgment","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}