{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"cody-gene-workman","displayName":"CODY GENE WORKMAN","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappsd:sd36366:2020-07-24","opinionId":"58e326de-466e-50ab-95f1-7a73be37b692","slug":"state-of-missouri-appellant-v-cody-gene-workman-respondent-d36366","caseName":"STATE OF MISSOURI, Appellant\nvs.\nCODY GENE WORKMAN, Respondent","caseNumber":"SD36366","court":"moappsd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District","decisionDate":"2020-07-24","year":2020,"display_summary":"Cody Gene Workman was charged with first-degree assault and armed criminal action. The trial court suppressed voice identifications made by witnesses, finding law enforcement's actions impermissibly suggestive. The State appealed this interlocutory order. The appellate court reversed the suppression order, holding that the police procedures were not suggestive and there was no substantial evidence to support the trial court's conclusion.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","evidence","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"reversed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=162933","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-appellant-v-cody-gene-workman-respondent-d36366","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":38,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","text: state of missouri","text: criminal","text: suppression"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}