{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"corey-mcclendon","displayName":"Corey McClendon","totalCases":2},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed108845:2021-02-23","opinionId":"94e4a0ed-d5c6-5b3a-bde3-d390f4295d86","slug":"corey-mcclendon-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-108845","caseName":"Corey McClendon, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED108845","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2021-02-23","year":2021,"display_summary":"Corey McClendon appealed the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, arguing the motion court erred by failing to conduct an inquiry into whether his counsel abandoned him and by concluding he did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The appellate court reversed and remanded the case, agreeing with both parties that the motion court clearly erred by failing to investigate the abandonment claim. The court instructed the motion court to conduct an abandonment inquiry to determine which motion, the pro se or amended, should be adjudicated.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","appellate-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"modified","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=173739","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/corey-mcclendon-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-108845","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":36,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","text: state of missouri","text: conviction"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed109767:undated","opinionId":"b01e588d-100d-5dcb-a6aa-aca4e294bbe2","slug":"corey-mcclendon-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-109767","caseName":"Corey McClendon, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED109767","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":null,"year":2022,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=188437","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/corey-mcclendon-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-109767","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"}]}