{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"cottle-automotive-repair-inc-d/b/a-automotive-specialist","displayName":"Cottle Automotive Repair, Inc., d/b/a Automotive Specialist","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd87255:undated","opinionId":"e689fa97-2f58-5939-b750-3a440f0e15fd","slug":"wasim-alagha-v-cottle-automotive-repair-inc-dba-automotive-specialist-d87255","caseName":"Wasim Alagha\nvs. \nCottle Automotive Repair, Inc., d/b/a Automotive Specialist","caseNumber":"WD87255","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2025,"display_summary":"Wasim Alagha appealed pro se from a circuit court judgment that found against him on his claim against Cottle Automotive Repair, Inc., d/b/a Automotive Specialist, following a trial de novo from small claims court. The appellate court dismissed Alagha's appeal. The dismissal was based on Alagha's substantial failure to comply with Rule 84.04's mandatory briefing requirements and his failure to provide a necessary transcript from the trial de novo as required by Rule 81.12.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","civil-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=220041","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/wasim-alagha-v-cottle-automotive-repair-inc-dba-automotive-specialist-d87255","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}