{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"csm-foreclosure-trustee-corp","displayName":"CSM FORECLOSURE TRUSTEE CORP.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappsd:sd35626:2019-05-06","opinionId":"c67c9db3-d2eb-5f08-b236-1ab03e2edfce","slug":"richard-a-carden-and-rosalie-p-carden-appellants-v-csm-foreclosure-truste-d35626","caseName":"RICHARD A. CARDEN and ROSALIE P. CARDEN, Appellants\nvs.\nCSM FORECLOSURE TRUSTEE CORP., Respondent","caseNumber":"SD35626","court":"moappsd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District","decisionDate":"2019-05-06","year":2019,"display_summary":"Richard and Rosalie Carden appealed, pro se, the dismissal of their petition for damages. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, finding that the Cardens' brief failed to comply with Rule 84.04's requirements for points relied on and argument sections, thereby preserving nothing for review. This marked the fifth time the Cardens' pro se appeals had been dismissed for similar briefing violations.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","civil-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=140093","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/richard-a-carden-and-rosalie-p-carden-appellants-v-csm-foreclosure-truste-d35626","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}