{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"ct","displayName":"C.T.","totalCases":3},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed109961:2022-05-03","opinionId":"76d79ce0-d9bf-522b-9581-586310ba6ecd","slug":"ey-appellant-v-ct-respondent-109961","caseName":"E.Y., Appellant, v. C.T., Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED109961","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2022-05-03","year":2022,"display_summary":"Appellant E.Y., acting pro se, appealed the circuit court's judgment denying an order of protection against Respondent C.T. C.T. filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, contending that E.Y. failed to fully compile the record on appeal by not submitting a certified transcript of the hearing as required by Rule 81.12. The appellate court granted C.T.'s motion, dismissing the appeal because E.Y. failed to provide an adequate record for review.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","civil-procedure","family-law"],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=186595","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/ey-appellant-v-ct-respondent-109961","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed110042:2022-05-03","opinionId":"21ab47fd-87aa-5212-a7a7-66f24fd5ce18","slug":"ct-respondent-v-ey-appellant-110042","caseName":"C.T., Respondent, v. E.Y., Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED110042","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2022-05-03","year":2022,"display_summary":"Appellant E.Y. appealed the circuit court's judgment granting Respondent C.T. an order of protection. C.T. filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, contending E.Y. violated Rule 81.12 by failing to order and submit a certified transcript of the order of protection hearing. The appellate court granted C.T.'s motion, dismissing the appeal for lack of an adequate record, as E.Y. failed to provide the required certified transcript.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","civil-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=186597","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/ct-respondent-v-ey-appellant-110042","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed110039:undated","opinionId":"4bfcc4c1-029e-5de0-90f5-7f8f5fdb20b9","slug":"ct-respondent-v-jll-appellant-110039","caseName":"C.T., Respondent, v. J.L.L., Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED110039","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":null,"year":2022,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=190435","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/ct-respondent-v-jll-appellant-110039","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"}],"role":"respondent"}]}