{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"darnell-hollings","displayName":"Darnell Hollings","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed110767:2023-03-28","opinionId":"12ae0b02-58e4-5a54-9156-6af015d46676","slug":"darnell-hollings-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-110767","caseName":"Darnell Hollings, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED110767","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2023-03-28","year":2023,"display_summary":"Darnell Hollings appealed the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and call crucial witnesses, and that his appellate counsel was ineffective for not raising a speedy trial violation. The appellate court affirmed the motion court's judgment, concluding that both trial and appellate counsel's strategies were reasonable and that Hollings failed to prove ineffective assistance.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review","evidence"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=193699","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/darnell-hollings-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-110767","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":36,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","text: state of missouri","text: conviction"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}