{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"david-l-kaercher","displayName":"David L. Kaercher","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed111737:2023-12-26","opinionId":"5b2b30fb-b4e2-54e3-b264-eb8be7401b0c","slug":"david-l-kaercher-appellant-v-director-of-revenue-respondent-111737","caseName":"David L. Kaercher, Appellant, vs. Director of Revenue, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED111737","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2023-12-26","year":2023,"display_summary":"David L. Kaercher appealed the trial court's judgment sustaining the revocation of his driving privileges after a DWI arrest and refusal of a chemical test. Kaercher argued the trial court erred by admitting certified Department of Revenue records without an original signature and by finding he was under arrest when read the implied consent warning. The Eastern District of Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment, concluding the records were properly certified and that Kaercher was under arrest for implied consent purposes.","primaryTopic":"administrative-law","topicSlugs":["administrative-law","evidence","criminal-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=203860","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/david-l-kaercher-appellant-v-director-of-revenue-respondent-111737","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":32,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}