{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"david-woody","displayName":"David Woody","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd87715:2025-10-14","opinionId":"3f12ea58-056b-5a0f-9822-1f4fd2ce364b","slug":"david-woody-v-patrick-clark-jay-bettis-richard-riddell-d87715","caseName":"David Woody\nvs. \nPatrick Clark, Jay Bettis, & Richard Riddell","caseNumber":"WD87715","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2025-10-14","year":2025,"display_summary":"David Woody, an elected County Clerk and member of the Missouri National Guard, sued the County Commission after it limited his salary payment to 120 hours per federal fiscal year during his 400-day active federal military deployment. Woody argued he was entitled to full salary under § 41.942.1, while the Commission relied on § 105.270.1. The circuit court granted judgment on the pleadings for the Commission. The appellate court affirmed, holding that § 41.942.1 preserves a deployed Guard member's compensation rate and terms (\"pay status\"), but not the right to continued salary payment during extended federal deployment.","primaryTopic":"employment-law","topicSlugs":["employment-law","civil-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=226094","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/david-woody-v-patrick-clark-jay-bettis-richard-riddell-d87715","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: employment-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}