{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"ddw","displayName":"D.D.W.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappsd:sd36177:2020-02-13","opinionId":"7367977d-6d82-5566-ba59-eeb8130dc9ad","slug":"ddw-respondent-v-mfa-appellant-d36177","caseName":"D.D.W., Respondent\nv.\nM.F.A., Appellant","caseNumber":"SD36177","court":"moappsd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District","decisionDate":"2020-02-13","year":2020,"display_summary":"M.F.A. appealed from a full order of protection issued in favor of D.D.W. under the Adult Abuse Act, challenging the sufficiency of evidence for findings of stalking and harassment, and the overall grant of the order. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding that M.F.A. failed to demonstrate reversible error in any of his three points on appeal. The court noted that M.F.A.'s arguments suffered from fundamental defects by not properly accounting for all favorable evidence or dispelling its probative value as required for a substantial evidence challenge.","primaryTopic":"family-law","topicSlugs":["family-law","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review","civil-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=150333","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/ddw-respondent-v-mfa-appellant-d36177","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":32,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: family-law","topic: family-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}