{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"dean-machinery-company","displayName":"Dean Machinery Company","totalCases":3},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd84108:2021-06-29","opinionId":"9144565d-812b-5d06-a450-a383412e55f3","slug":"dean-machinery-company-v-anthony-joseph-rigoli-d84108","caseName":"Dean Machinery Company\nvs. \nAnthony Joseph Rigoli","caseNumber":"WD84108","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2021-06-29","year":2021,"display_summary":"Dean Machinery Company appealed the circuit court's denial of its motion to revive a 2005 judgment against Anthony Rigoli. The circuit court denied the motion, finding that Dean's five-year delay in submitting a proposed order constituted good cause for denial. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that delay in filing a proposed order is not one of the limited defenses available to a judgment debtor under Rule 74.09, and thus the circuit court erred in denying the timely-filed motion for revival.","primaryTopic":"civil-procedure","topicSlugs":["civil-procedure","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=178221","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/dean-machinery-company-v-anthony-joseph-rigoli-d84108","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd61205:undated","opinionId":"d03639c2-7649-5f3a-a106-9c04dca57fc8","slug":"dean-machinery-company-respondent-v-union-bank-fka-bannister-bank-appella-d61205","caseName":"Dean Machinery Company, Respondent v. Union Bank f/k/a Bannister Bank, Appellant.","caseNumber":"WD61205","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2003,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"reversed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=20367","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/dean-machinery-company-respondent-v-union-bank-fka-bannister-bank-appella-d61205","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd62576:undated","opinionId":"a30b754d-78a1-56d9-80b0-8358757ce466","slug":"lowell-perkins-et-ux-appellants-v-dean-machinery-company-respondent-d62576","caseName":"Lowell Perkins, et ux., Appellants v. Dean Machinery Company, Respondent","caseNumber":"WD62576","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2004,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=20648","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/lowell-perkins-et-ux-appellants-v-dean-machinery-company-respondent-d62576","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"}]}