{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"dennis-laramore","displayName":"Dennis Laramore","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed111782:2024-03-12","opinionId":"df8ae341-3f63-58f4-b2d3-008024affd96","slug":"dennis-laramore-appellant-v-zachary-jacobsen-et-al-respondents-111782","caseName":"Dennis Laramore, Appellant, vs. Zachary Jacobsen, et al., Respondents.","caseNumber":"ED111782","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2024-03-12","year":2024,"display_summary":"Dennis Laramore filed a replevin petition seeking the return of items seized during a search warrant. The trial court granted summary judgment for the respondent officers, finding Laramore's claim time-barred. On appeal, the Eastern District reversed and remanded, holding that the respondents' motion for summary judgment was legally defective for failing to attach a statement of uncontroverted material facts as required by Rule 74.04(c)(1). The court did not reach the merits of the statute of limitations issue.","primaryTopic":"civil-procedure","topicSlugs":["civil-procedure","summary-judgment","other"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=206345","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/dennis-laramore-appellant-v-zachary-jacobsen-et-al-respondents-111782","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":20,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: real-estate"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":16,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: summary-judgment","text: summary judgment"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}