{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"diane-peterson-et-al","displayName":"Diane Peterson, Et Al.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd86986:undated","opinionId":"7efdbf90-d3f8-5ead-b0d6-b7c6ab5ecceb","slug":"robynn-saucier-crawford-v-diane-peterson-et-al-d86986","caseName":"Robynn Saucier Crawford\nvs. \nDiane Peterson, Et Al.","caseNumber":"WD86986","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2024,"display_summary":"Robynn Saucier Crawford appealed the circuit court's dismissal of her petition against employees of the Jackson County Medical Examiner's Office, which alleged various claims related to the handling of her estranged husband's body. The trial court had dismissed her petition with prejudice based on the statute of limitations. The appellate court dismissed Crawford's appeal due to numerous and persistent briefing deficiencies, specifically violations of Rule 84.04, even after she was given an opportunity to correct them.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","civil-procedure","other"],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=210778","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/robynn-saucier-crawford-v-diane-peterson-et-al-d86986","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: employment"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}