{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"drf-iii","displayName":"D.R.F., III","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed109371:2022-02-15","opinionId":"2625798e-10cf-5214-af6d-e6e27ba7a812","slug":"drf-iii-respondent-v-dls-appellant-109371","caseName":"D.R.F., III, Respondent, vs. D.L.S., Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED109371","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2022-02-15","year":2022,"display_summary":"D.L.S. appealed the trial court's entry of a one-year full order of protection in favor of D.R.F. III, which was granted after the trial court found D.L.S.'s conduct constituted stalking. On appeal, D.L.S. raised three points challenging the order. The appellate court dismissed the appeal for mootness, determining that the protective order had expired prior to argument and submission, and the case did not fall within any exception to the mootness doctrine.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","family-law","other"],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=184396","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/drf-iii-respondent-v-dls-appellant-109371","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":32,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: family-law","topic: family-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}