{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"emerald-pointe-llc-plaintiff","displayName":"EMERALD POINTE, LLC, Plaintiff-","totalCases":2},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappsd:sd36725:2021-04-08","opinionId":"282bf9f8-dfc2-54cf-848f-bd1efa7ef241","slug":"emerald-pointe-llc-plaintiff-appellant-v-taney-county-planning-commission-d36725","caseName":"EMERALD POINTE, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant\nvs.\nTANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION and TANEY COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Defendants-Respondents","caseNumber":"SD36725","court":"moappsd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District","decisionDate":"2021-04-08","year":2021,"display_summary":"Emerald Pointe, LLC, a developer, appealed a stop work order issued by the Taney County Planning Commission for Phase 12 of its subdivision. The Commission insisted that Emerald Pointe comply with road grading requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and Road Standards, which Emerald Pointe contended did not apply to its private streets. The circuit court affirmed the Board of Adjustment's decision denying Emerald Pointe's appeal. The appellate court reversed, holding that the Road Standards' grading requirements do not apply to the private streets in Phase 12, as the regulations differentiate between public and private roads.","primaryTopic":"administrative-law","topicSlugs":["administrative-law","property-real-estate","appellate-procedure","civil-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"remanded","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=176633","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/emerald-pointe-llc-plaintiff-appellant-v-taney-county-planning-commission-d36725","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":32,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: real-estate","topic: property-real-estate"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"},{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":4,"source":"text","evidence":["text: llc"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappsd:sd35733:2019-07-01","opinionId":"65ea2f45-37bc-5cd1-8664-110a462e9648","slug":"emerald-pointe-llc-plaintiff-appellant-v-taney-county-planning-commission-d35733","caseName":"EMERALD POINTE, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant\nvs.\nTANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, et al., Defendants-Respondents","caseNumber":"SD35733","court":"moappsd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District","decisionDate":"2019-07-01","year":2019,"display_summary":"Emerald Pointe, LLC, a developer, appealed the trial court's dismissal of its petition challenging a stop work order issued by the Taney County Planning Commission and upheld by the Board of Adjustment. The trial court dismissed the petition for failure to state a claim under section 64.870.2, reasoning that it did not explicitly mention the statute and sought injunctive and declaratory relief not contemplated by the statute. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that the petition met the statutory requirements for judicial review and that the inclusion of requests for injunctive and declaratory relief, while superfluous, did not negate the claim for judicial review.","primaryTopic":"administrative-law","topicSlugs":["administrative-law","civil-procedure","appellate-procedure","property-real-estate"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=142013","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/emerald-pointe-llc-plaintiff-appellant-v-taney-county-planning-commission-d35733","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":32,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: real-estate","topic: property-real-estate"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"},{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":4,"source":"text","evidence":["text: llc"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"}],"role":"appellant"}]}