{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"eric-burnette","displayName":"Eric Burnette","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed108017:2020-04-28","opinionId":"a1e05ebc-5170-58fc-a720-beafbfc203b1","slug":"eric-burnette-appellant-v-aramark-services-inc-and-division-of-employment-108017","caseName":"Eric Burnette, Appellant, vs. Aramark Services, Inc., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.","caseNumber":"ED108017","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2020-04-28","year":2020,"display_summary":"Eric Burnette appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision denying him unemployment benefits. The Commission had affirmed the Appeals Tribunal's finding that Burnette was ineligible for benefits because his vacation pay exceeded the weekly benefit amount. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, finding that Burnette's pro se brief failed to substantially comply with Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.04, thereby preserving nothing for review.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","administrative-law","employment-law"],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=155516","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/eric-burnette-appellant-v-aramark-services-inc-and-division-of-employment-108017","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":32,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: employment","topic: employment-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}