{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"harps-food-stores","displayName":"Harps Food Stores","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed113183:undated","opinionId":"b04d1f1f-5551-5059-9f69-ad14439d58f7","slug":"david-mecey-and-robin-mecey-appellants-v-harps-food-stores-respondent-113183","caseName":"David Mecey and Robin Mecey, Appellants, v. Harps Food Stores, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED113183","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":null,"year":2025,"display_summary":"David and Robin Mecey appealed the grant of summary judgment in favor of Harps Food Stores. The appellate court dismissed the appeal due to the Meceys' substantial failure to comply with mandatory appellate briefing rules, specifically Rule 84.04. The court found deficiencies in the statement of facts, points relied on, argument section, and the absence of an appendix, which collectively precluded appellate review of the merits.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","civil-procedure","summary-judgment"],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=225078","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/david-mecey-and-robin-mecey-appellants-v-harps-food-stores-respondent-113183","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: summary-judgment","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}