{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"henry-thompson","displayName":"Henry Thompson","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd81415:2019-03-12","opinionId":"2da3eda7-21d3-5bb4-9f6f-c74c80d0d800","slug":"henry-thompson-v-state-of-missouri-d81415","caseName":"Henry Thompson\nvs.\nState of Missouri","caseNumber":"WD81415","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2019-03-12","year":2019,"display_summary":"Henry Thompson appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Thompson argued that the sentencing court's assessment of $909.16 in venire panel costs was an unauthorized, de facto penalty. The appellate court affirmed the motion court's denial, holding that the assessment was a cost, not part of Thompson's sentence, and therefore not cognizable under Rule 24.035.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","appellate-procedure","civil-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=137833","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/henry-thompson-v-state-of-missouri-d81415","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":38,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","text: state of missouri","text: conviction","text: sentence"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}