{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"hoeman-capital-management","displayName":"Hoeman Capital Management","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed112375:2025-06-10","opinionId":"7c4fb8f4-07bc-5e03-a05f-e767d928d11f","slug":"hoeman-capital-management-respondent-v-david-robinson-and-7-r-farm-compan-112375","caseName":"Hoeman Capital Management, Respondent, vs. David Robinson and 7 R Farm Company, Appellants.","caseNumber":"ED112375","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2025-06-10","year":2025,"display_summary":"David Robinson and 7 R Farm Company appealed a default judgment entered in favor of Hoeman Capital Management (HCM) for breach of an agreement to pay consulting fees. Robinson and the Farm argued the judgment was void due to lack of personal jurisdiction. The appellate court agreed, finding that Robinson's minimal contacts with Missouri did not satisfy the long-arm statute's \"transaction of business\" prong, and the breach of contract action did not arise out of those contacts. The court vacated the trial court's judgment.","primaryTopic":"civil-procedure","topicSlugs":["civil-procedure","contracts","appellate-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"modified","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=221234","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/hoeman-capital-management-respondent-v-david-robinson-and-7-r-farm-compan-112375","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":36,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: corporate","topic: contracts","text: business","text: contract"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}