{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"jackson-county-juvenile-office","displayName":"Jackson County Juvenile Office","totalCases":4},"cases":[{"caseId":"mo:sc99231:2022-01-11","opinionId":"22464760-8a8f-525d-91ad-277005da15a8","slug":"in-the-interest-of-cara-appellant-v-jackson-county-juvenile-office-respon-c99231","caseName":"In the Interest of: C.A.R.A., Appellant, vs. Jackson County Juvenile Office, Respondent.","caseNumber":"SC99231","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2022-01-11","year":2022,"display_summary":"C.A.R.A., a juvenile, was found by the Jackson County circuit court to have committed acts constituting first-degree statutory sodomy. C.A.R.A. appealed, asserting that the circuit court violated their constitutional right to confrontation by allowing witness testimony via two-way live video during the adjudication hearing. The Missouri Supreme Court vacated the circuit court's judgment and remanded the case, holding that the circuit court failed to make the required witness-specific findings for remote testimony under both Maryland v. Craig (for child victims) and Crawford v. Washington (for adult witnesses), and also misapplied the Supreme Court's COVID-19 operational directives.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","evidence","appellate-procedure","administrative-law"],"outcomeNorm":"modified","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=183377","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/in-the-interest-of-cara-appellant-v-jackson-county-juvenile-office-respon-c99231","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":32,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"mo:sc99251:2022-01-11","opinionId":"b206951f-e925-5bf4-8fa0-ac3ffdd6bfca","slug":"in-the-interest-of-jat-appellant-v-jackson-county-juvenile-office-respond-c99251","caseName":"In the Interest of:  J.A.T., Appellant, vs. Jackson County Juvenile Office, Respondent.","caseNumber":"SC99251","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2022-01-11","year":2022,"display_summary":"J.A.T., a juvenile, appealed the circuit court's finding that he committed acts constituting first-degree assault and armed criminal action. J.A.T. argued that requiring his participation in the adjudication hearing via two-way video violated his constitutional due process and confrontation rights. The Missouri Supreme Court vacated the circuit court's judgment and remanded the case, holding that the circuit court erred by denying J.A.T.'s due process right to be physically present at the critical stage of his adjudication hearing.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","civil-procedure","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"modified","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=183378","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/in-the-interest-of-jat-appellant-v-jackson-county-juvenile-office-respond-c99251","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":32,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd83967:undated","opinionId":"d8793f77-39a4-5863-b82a-b10245282f99","slug":"in-the-interest-of-cara-v-jackson-county-juvenile-office-d83967","caseName":"In the Interest of: C.A.R.A.\nvs. \nJackson County Juvenile Office","caseNumber":"WD83967","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2021,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"transferred","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=178495","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/in-the-interest-of-cara-v-jackson-county-juvenile-office-d83967","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd83968:undated","opinionId":"488d7559-5623-5823-b158-0f390eefd495","slug":"in-the-interest-of-jat-v-jackson-county-juvenile-office-d83968","caseName":"In the Interest of: J.A.T.\nvs. \nJackson County Juvenile Office","caseNumber":"WD83968","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2021,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"transferred","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=178814","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/in-the-interest-of-jat-v-jackson-county-juvenile-office-d83968","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"}]}