{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"james-kalish","displayName":"James Kalish","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed110301:2023-01-17","opinionId":"0e2a7893-9870-558a-b63e-99e013b72c38","slug":"gina-kalish-respondent-v-james-kalish-appellant-110301","caseName":"Gina Kalish, Respondent, vs. James Kalish, Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED110301","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2023-01-17","year":2023,"display_summary":"James Kalish (Husband) appealed the trial court's denial of his motion to set aside a 2014 order nunc pro tunc. The 2014 order purported to correct a 2013 divorce judgment by granting Gina Kalish (Wife) the entire pension instead of half. The appellate court agreed that the 2014 order was an improper modification of a final judgment, not a mere clerical error. However, the court affirmed the denial of Husband's motion because his six-year delay in filing the motion was not within a \"reasonable time\" as required by Rule 74.06(c).","primaryTopic":"family-law","topicSlugs":["family-law","divorce","civil-procedure","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=191755","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/gina-kalish-respondent-v-james-kalish-appellant-110301","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":32,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: family-law","topic: family-law","topic: divorce"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}