{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"jamie-a-marx","displayName":"Jamie A. Marx","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:parent-194356","opinionId":"aa139540-07c9-5b17-9fb7-c45708f4893c","slug":"jamie-a-marx-appellant-v-division-of-employment-security-respondent-110579","caseName":"Jamie A. Marx, Appellant, v. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED110579","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2023-04-11","year":2023,"display_summary":"Jamie Marx appealed five orders from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which had dismissed his administrative appeals as untimely. Marx had appealed determinations of ineligibility for unemployment benefits and overpayment of benefits. The appellate court affirmed the Commission's orders, holding that the Commission did not abuse its discretion in finding no good cause for the untimely appeal of the ineligibility determination, and that appeals of overpayment determinations are not subject to extension for good cause.","primaryTopic":"administrative-law","topicSlugs":["administrative-law","appellate-procedure","civil-procedure","other"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=194356","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/jamie-a-marx-appellant-v-division-of-employment-security-respondent-110579","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: employment"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}