{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"jeremy-baum","displayName":"Jeremy Baum","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd85148:undated","opinionId":"9eda0550-18f8-5b0b-a2d7-1bc9fccf1003","slug":"state-of-missouri-v-jeremy-baum-d85148","caseName":"State of Missouri\nvs.\nJeremy Baum","caseNumber":"WD85148","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2025,"display_summary":"Jeremy Baum appealed his convictions for sexual trafficking of a child in the second degree and promoting a sexual performance by a child, arguing insufficient evidence. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the evidence was sufficient to show Baum enticed the victim to engage in a sexual performance by directing her masturbation while he watched. The court also found sufficient evidence that Baum promoted a sexual performance by instructing the victim on vibrator use, with the relevant conduct occurring in Missouri.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","evidence","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=217996","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-v-jeremy-baum-d85148","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":32,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}