{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"jml","displayName":"J.M.L.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed110665:2023-09-19","opinionId":"9c97883a-fdb2-5d18-b0ee-54ee79c89073","slug":"jml-respondent-v-missouri-state-highway-patrol-et-al-appellant-110665","caseName":"J.M.L., Respondent, vs. Missouri State Highway Patrol, et al., Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED110665","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2023-09-19","year":2023,"display_summary":"J.M.L. filed a petition to be removed from the Missouri sex offender registry, which the circuit court granted. The Missouri State Highway Patrol appealed, arguing the circuit court erred by not determining if J.M.L. was required to register under federal SORNA. The appellate court reversed the circuit court's judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings, finding that an incomplete record on appeal prevented proper review of the claim.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","civil-procedure","other"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=201214","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/jml-respondent-v-missouri-state-highway-patrol-et-al-appellant-110665","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}