{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"joanthony-d-johnson","displayName":"Joanthony D. Johnson","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd85067:2023-04-04","opinionId":"b88544cb-01c3-5d58-af48-0cce71ac870f","slug":"joanthony-d-johnson-v-state-of-missouri-d85067","caseName":"Joanthony D. Johnson \nvs. \nState of Missouri","caseNumber":"WD85067","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2023-04-04","year":2023,"display_summary":"Joanthony Johnson appealed the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, alleging five claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Johnson argued his counsel erred regarding a cell phone extraction agreement, the observation of his phone's passcode, the scope of a suppression motion, and a motion for improper joinder and severance. The Western District affirmed the motion court's judgment, finding no error in its denial of Johnson's claims.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","search-and-seizure","evidence","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=193915","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/joanthony-d-johnson-v-state-of-missouri-d85067","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":38,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","topic: search-and-seizure","text: state of missouri","text: conviction","text: suppression"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}