{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"john-doe","displayName":"John Doe","totalCases":13},"cases":[{"caseId":"mo:sc100296:2024-08-13","opinionId":"b0ebe16a-c734-56da-b2a1-5f7925ba874a","slug":"john-doe-v-eric-t-olson-et-al-100296","caseName":"John Doe v. Eric T. Olson, et al.","caseNumber":"SC100296","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2024-08-13","year":2024,"display_summary":"John Doe appealed the circuit court's judgment upholding the Missouri Sex Offender Registry Act (MO-SORA) against his constitutional challenges. Doe argued that MO-SORA's registration requirements violated his substantive due process rights and the prohibition on ex post facto laws, particularly given his sealed criminal records and subsequent amendments to the Act. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Doe has no fundamental right to privacy in the disclosed information and the registry is rationally related to protecting children. The Court further found that MO-SORA's registration requirements are civil in nature and therefore do not violate the ex post facto clause.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","other","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=210313","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-v-eric-t-olson-et-al-100296","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":32,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"mo:sc99310:2022-04-26","opinionId":"6ea4ba90-a2a1-535f-91b1-6a305617d45f","slug":"john-doe-appellant-v-kurt-frisz-chief-law-enforcement-officer-st-charles-c99310","caseName":"John Doe, Appellant, vs. Kurt Frisz, Chief Law Enforcement Officer, St. Charles County, Missouri, Respondent.","caseNumber":"SC99310","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2022-04-26","year":2022,"display_summary":"Petitioner John Doe pleaded guilty to four counts of endangering the welfare of a child. Months later, his probation officer informed him he needed to register as a sex offender based on abandoned charges, prompting Doe to seek a writ of prohibition against Sheriff Kurt Frisz. The circuit court denied a permanent writ. The Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed the denial of the writ, holding that while the circuit court erred in considering abandoned charges to determine sex offender status, a writ of prohibition was not the proper remedy because the Sheriff's notification was an executive, not a judicial or quasi-judicial, act.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","administrative-law","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review","other"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=186457","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-appellant-v-kurt-frisz-chief-law-enforcement-officer-st-charles-c99310","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":32,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed104149:2016-12-13","opinionId":"2d34671a-47e5-5314-ae3e-684a7f18f63a","slug":"john-doe-appellant-v-st-louis-county-police-department-criminal-records-r-104149","caseName":"John Doe, Appellant, vs. St. Louis County Police Department, Criminal Records Repository, St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Associate Court Division 35, and Lambert International Airport P.D. Transportation Security Administration, Respondents.","caseNumber":"ED104149","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2016-12-13","year":2016,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=108216","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-appellant-v-st-louis-county-police-department-criminal-records-r-104149","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed99707:2014-02-18","opinionId":"43536552-426a-509a-b115-0db15f30ec54","slug":"john-doe-respondent-v-col-daniel-isom-et-al-appellants-d99707","caseName":"John Doe, Respondent, vs. Col. Daniel Isom, et al., Appellants.","caseNumber":"ED99707","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2014-02-18","year":2014,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=70134","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-respondent-v-col-daniel-isom-et-al-appellants-d99707","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed99249:2013-06-25","opinionId":"59a6a9c0-34d2-5809-a11e-522b4c25be0d","slug":"john-doe-appellant-v-tom-neer-et-al-respondents-d99249","caseName":"John Doe, Appellant, vs. Tom Neer, et al., Respondents.","caseNumber":"ED99249","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2013-06-25","year":2013,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=62962","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-appellant-v-tom-neer-et-al-respondents-d99249","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"mo:sc92380:2012-12-18","opinionId":"53abec08-16f0-50af-ace7-ce44aafeccf1","slug":"john-doe-respondent-v-franklin-county-sheriff-gary-f-toelke-defendant-col-c92380","caseName":"John Doe, Respondent vs. Franklin County Sheriff Gary F. Toelke, Defendant, Col. Ron Replogle, Missouri State Highway Patrol, Appellant.","caseNumber":"SC92380","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2012-12-18","year":2012,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=58646","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-respondent-v-franklin-county-sheriff-gary-f-toelke-defendant-col-c92380","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed90404:2009-01-06","opinionId":"10e68acc-4228-5d51-86d3-759b8b2bf1c5","slug":"john-doe-appellant-v-jerry-lee-and-james-keathley-respondents-d90404","caseName":"John Doe, Appellant, v. Jerry Lee and James Keathley, Respondents.","caseNumber":"ED90404","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2009-01-06","year":2009,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=28254","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-appellant-v-jerry-lee-and-james-keathley-respondents-d90404","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed87225:undated","opinionId":"5f9fb6e4-da1c-5668-b547-4aeb0059cba6","slug":"john-doe-respondent-v-charles-hamilton-appellant-d87225","caseName":"John Doe, Respondent v. Charles Hamilton, Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED87225","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":null,"year":2006,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=16411","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-respondent-v-charles-hamilton-appellant-d87225","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"mo:sc87786:undated","opinionId":"b341d750-96f9-5439-a793-760d070c96b9","slug":"john-doe-appellant-v-honorable-matt-blunt-et-al-respondents-c87786","caseName":"John Doe, Appellant v. Honorable Matt Blunt, et al., Respondents.","caseNumber":"SC87786","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":null,"year":2007,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"reversed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=26504","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-appellant-v-honorable-matt-blunt-et-al-respondents-c87786","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed106264:undated","opinionId":"0028f4da-d988-5bdc-bfa3-5c2352ae6382","slug":"john-doe-appellant-v-colonel-jon-belmar-and-missouri-state-highway-patrol-106264","caseName":"John Doe, Appellant, vs. Colonel Jon Belmar and Missouri State Highway Patrol, Respondents.","caseNumber":"ED106264","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":null,"year":2018,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=134808","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-appellant-v-colonel-jon-belmar-and-missouri-state-highway-patrol-106264","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd68910:undated","opinionId":"71eeb305-8959-52af-a919-3fcaaba4174d","slug":"john-doe-respondent-v-thomas-phillips-et-al-defendants-james-f-keathley-a-d68910","caseName":"John Doe, Respondent, v. Thomas Phillips, et al., Defendants, James F. Keathley, Appellant.","caseNumber":"WD68910","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2008,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=21512","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-respondent-v-thomas-phillips-et-al-defendants-james-f-keathley-a-d68910","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd72121:undated","opinionId":"69821b1e-bb10-5098-84bd-1c2703c14b73","slug":"john-doe-v-james-f-keathley-d72121","caseName":"John Doe vs. James F. Keathley","caseNumber":"WD72121","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2011,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=46104","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-v-james-f-keathley-d72121","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd72188:undated","opinionId":"4f87c1b9-59a4-5c4d-acfe-5efefde24f47","slug":"john-doe-v-col-ron-peplogle-in-his-official-capacity-as-superintendent-of-d72188","caseName":"John Doe vs. Col. Ron Peplogle in his Official Capacity as Superintendent of the Missouri Highway Patrol","caseNumber":"WD72188","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2011,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"reversed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=46105","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-v-col-ron-peplogle-in-his-official-capacity-as-superintendent-of-d72188","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"}]}