{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"joshua-smith","displayName":"Joshua Smith","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd83657:2021-03-30","opinionId":"fa6b6422-7c34-5c34-b9bf-e1c9a0281bd3","slug":"state-of-missouri-v-joshua-smith-d83657","caseName":"State of Missouri\nvs. \nJoshua Smith","caseNumber":"WD83657","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2021-03-30","year":2021,"display_summary":"Joshua Smith appealed his conviction for drug and firearm offenses, arguing the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence. Smith contended that he did not voluntarily consent to the warrantless entry and search of his mobile home by law enforcement due to being under the influence of narcotics. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, holding that the totality of the circumstances supported the trial court's finding that Smith's consent was voluntary and knowing.","primaryTopic":"search-and-seizure","topicSlugs":["search-and-seizure","criminal-procedure","evidence","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=175862","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-v-joshua-smith-d83657","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":38,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","topic: search-and-seizure","text: state of missouri","text: conviction"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}