{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"jr","displayName":"J.R.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd87033:2024-10-29","opinionId":"bf53346d-be7a-559a-b90a-8af47dffef49","slug":"jr-v-ps-d87033","caseName":"J.R.\nvs.\nP.S.","caseNumber":"WD87033","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2024-10-29","year":2024,"display_summary":"P.S. appealed pro se from a judgment renewing a Full Order of Protection obtained by J.R. against him. The appellate court found that P.S.'s brief substantially failed to comply with Rule 84.04's mandatory requirements, specifically regarding the points relied on and the argument section. Consequently, the court determined it could not review the appeal on its merits and dismissed the appeal.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","civil-procedure","family-law"],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=213998","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/jr-v-ps-d87033","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":20,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: real-estate"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"},{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: family-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}