{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"kc","displayName":"K.C.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd83881:2021-09-21","opinionId":"85fa0f18-7058-5761-9fcd-c40c2800166d","slug":"kc-v-kent-chapline-d83881","caseName":"K.C.\nvs.\nKent Chapline","caseNumber":"WD83881","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2021-09-21","year":2021,"display_summary":"K.C. sought and obtained a renewal of a full order of protection against Kent Chapline. Chapline, a Texas resident, appealed the renewal, asserting the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over him and that K.C. failed to present sufficient evidence. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that the trial court retained personal jurisdiction and that substantial evidence supported the renewal of the protective order.","primaryTopic":"family-law","topicSlugs":["family-law","civil-procedure","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review","evidence"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=180574","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/kc-v-kent-chapline-d83881","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: family-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}