{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"klh","displayName":"K.L.H.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed112951:undated","opinionId":"6a2fce64-2acf-58a5-9870-b4de7547403f","slug":"klh-respondent-v-nr-appellant-112951","caseName":"K.L.H., Respondent, v. N.R., Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED112951","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":null,"year":2025,"display_summary":"K.L.H. sought a full order of protection against N.R., alleging sexual assault. The trial court issued the order, and N.R. appealed, claiming a violation of his procedural due process rights due to an inadequate opportunity to cross-examine K.L.H. The appellate court agreed that a due process violation occurred but affirmed the order because N.R. failed to preserve the issue for appellate review and did not demonstrate manifest injustice for plain error review.","primaryTopic":"family-law","topicSlugs":["family-law","civil-procedure","appellate-procedure","other"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=227574","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/klh-respondent-v-nr-appellant-112951","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: family-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}