{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"lake-lotawana-association-inc-et-al","displayName":"Lake Lotawana Association, INC., Et Al.","totalCases":2},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd62488:undated","opinionId":"f5e340ad-ce49-5960-a0f2-51a9efb23161","slug":"goat-hill-development-company-et-al-respondent-v-lake-lotawana-associatio-d62488","caseName":"Goat Hill Development Company, et al., Respondent v. Lake Lotawana Association, Inc., et al., Appellant.","caseNumber":"WD62488","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2004,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=20578","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/goat-hill-development-company-et-al-respondent-v-lake-lotawana-associatio-d62488","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":20,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: real-estate"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd86307:undated","opinionId":"28459f37-fe8f-5c77-b015-ff66faacea75","slug":"the-switzer-living-trust-ua-dated-february-5-2019-by-and-through-alan-t-s-d86307","caseName":"The Switzer Living Trust, U/A Dated February 5, 2019, by and through Alan T. Switzer & Gayle L. Switzer, As Co-Trustees\nvs.\nLake Lotawana Association, INC., Et Al.","caseNumber":"WD86307","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2024,"display_summary":"Switzer Living Trust appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Lake Lotawana and the Lake Lotawana Association, Inc., on claims related to a plat amendment and alleged breach of deed restrictions. The appellate court affirmed the judgments, finding that Switzer Trust's brief failed to comply with Missouri Rules 74.04 and 84.04 by not properly presenting the material facts established in the summary judgment record. This procedural deficiency prevented the court from reviewing the merits of the appeal without acting as an advocate.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","summary-judgment","civil-procedure","property-real-estate","governmental-immunity"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=207079","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/the-switzer-living-trust-ua-dated-february-5-2019-by-and-through-alan-t-s-d86307","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":16,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: summary-judgment","topic: appellate-procedure","text: summary judgment"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"},{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: property-real-estate"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"}],"role":"respondent"}]}