{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"marianist-province-of-the-united-states-and-chaminade-college-preparatory-inc-respondents-and-fr-martin-solma","displayName":"Marianist Province of the United States and Chaminade College Preparatory, Inc., Respondents, and Fr. Martin Solma","totalCases":2},"cases":[{"caseId":"mo:sc98307:2021-04-06","opinionId":"b26b5d58-1030-5565-9fae-d061ae101987","slug":"john-doe-122-appellant-v-marianist-province-of-the-united-states-and-cham-c98307","caseName":"John Doe 122, Appellant, vs. Marianist Province of the United States and Chaminade College Preparatory, Inc., Respondents, and Fr. Martin Solma, Defendant.","caseNumber":"SC98307","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2021-04-06","year":2021,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=176494","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-122-appellant-v-marianist-province-of-the-united-states-and-cham-c98307","relatedPracticeAreas":[],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed107767:2019-12-31","opinionId":"314e7e4f-2c9c-5c2e-b155-8c91cb2248d0","slug":"john-doe-122-appellant-v-marianist-province-of-the-united-states-and-cham-107767","caseName":"John Doe 122, Appellant, vs. Marianist Province of the United States and Chaminade College Preparatory, Inc., Respondents, and Fr. Martin Solma, Defendant.","caseNumber":"ED107767","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2019-12-31","year":2019,"display_summary":"John Doe 122 appealed the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Marianist Province and Chaminade College Preparatory on claims including sexual abuse, negligent supervision, and intentional failure to supervise clergy. The appellate court found that negligent supervision claims were barred by the First Amendment entanglement doctrine, and the intentional failure to supervise claim lacked sufficient evidence of prior knowledge due to speculative expert testimony. Although the court would have affirmed the judgment, it transferred the case to the Supreme Court of Missouri due to the general interest and importance of the issues.","primaryTopic":"negligence","topicSlugs":["negligence","summary-judgment","evidence","appellate-procedure","governmental-immunity"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=147876","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-doe-122-appellant-v-marianist-province-of-the-united-states-and-cham-107767","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":32,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: personal-injury","topic: negligence"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: summary-judgment","topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}