{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-district","displayName":"Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District","totalCases":9},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed111833:2024-04-23","opinionId":"7ec1e22e-c316-50d7-b758-1083d84e1e8b","slug":"tamar-godfrey-appellant-v-metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-district-respondent-111833","caseName":"Tamar Godfrey, Appellant, vs. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED111833","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2024-04-23","year":2024,"display_summary":"Tamar Godfrey appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision affirming the dismissal of her workers' compensation claim for failure to prosecute. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, finding that Godfrey's notice of appeal was untimely filed three days after the statutory deadline. The court further held that Godfrey's motion for reconsideration did not extend the deadline, as it was treated as an untimely amended application for review.","primaryTopic":"workers-compensation","topicSlugs":["workers-compensation","appellate-procedure","administrative-law","civil-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=207503","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/tamar-godfrey-appellant-v-metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-district-respondent-111833","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"},{"slug":"workers-compensation","label":"Workers' Compensation","href":"/practice-areas/workers-compensation","score":16,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/workers-compensation"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed111671:2023-12-19","opinionId":"97f1e869-826a-581f-8888-eaaf7be74f41","slug":"stl-riverview-plaza-llc-appellant-v-metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-district-111671","caseName":"STL Riverview Plaza LLC, Appellant, v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED111671","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2023-12-19","year":2023,"display_summary":"STL Riverview Plaza LLC sued the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD) for breach of contract and declaratory judgment, alleging MSD breached temporary construction easements by occupying property beyond verbally represented time limits. The circuit court granted summary judgment for MSD, finding the alleged oral agreements void under Section 432.070 and barred by the parol evidence rule. The Eastern District affirmed, holding that contracts with municipal corporations must be in writing and that the written easements were completely integrated and unambiguous, precluding extrinsic evidence of oral representations.","primaryTopic":"contracts","topicSlugs":["contracts","civil-procedure","summary-judgment","governmental-immunity","property-real-estate"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=203699","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/stl-riverview-plaza-llc-appellant-v-metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-district-111671","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":32,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"},{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":18,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed96512:2012-04-17","opinionId":"d91e6189-6955-547b-9320-855eb115a33d","slug":"metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-district-respondent-v-st-ann-plaza-inc-and-to-d96512","caseName":"Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Respondent, vs. St. Ann Plaza, Inc. and Tomax Development Corporation, Appellants.","caseNumber":"ED96512","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2012-04-17","year":2012,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=53596","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-district-respondent-v-st-ann-plaza-inc-and-to-d96512","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed95446:2011-04-19","opinionId":"a8570873-332e-5de7-b6b4-86417e33547c","slug":"fred-eppenberger-maxine-smith-and-william-bain-individually-and-on-behalf-d95446","caseName":"Fred Eppenberger, Maxine Smith and William Bain, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Appellants, v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED95446","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2011-04-19","year":2011,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"reversed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=46049","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/fred-eppenberger-maxine-smith-and-william-bain-individually-and-on-behalf-d95446","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed93955:2010-08-31","opinionId":"31bedea7-2673-5fe8-af00-9b1e8dc25386","slug":"metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-district-respondent-v-tomax-development-corpo-d93955","caseName":"Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Respondent, v. Tomax Development Corporation and Sav Investment Corporation, f/k/a Lemay Land Corporation, Appellants.","caseNumber":"ED93955","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2010-08-31","year":2010,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=40863","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-district-respondent-v-tomax-development-corpo-d93955","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":6,"source":"text","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"mo:sc88637:undated","opinionId":"22be2c36-3639-563b-b257-378789af71e7","slug":"union-electric-co-dba-ameren-ue-respondent-v-metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-c88637","caseName":"Union Electric Co. d/b/a Ameren UE, Respondent v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Appellant.","caseNumber":"SC88637","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":null,"year":2008,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=26618","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/union-electric-co-dba-ameren-ue-respondent-v-metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-c88637","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed113312:undated","opinionId":"510c9d00-b2df-58bc-8d3e-fdcd4530e2f6","slug":"wmac-2013-llc-appellant-v-metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-district-respondent-113312","caseName":"WMAC 2013, LLC, Appellant, v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED113312","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":null,"year":2026,"display_summary":"WMAC 2013, LLC appealed a trial court judgment that quieted title to real property in its favor but subjected it to a lien for unpaid sewer charges held by Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD). During the appeal's pendency, the MSD lien was paid in full. The appellate court dismissed the appeal as moot, concluding that the satisfaction of the lien rendered it unable to grant effectual relief.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","property-real-estate"],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=229840","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/wmac-2013-llc-appellant-v-metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-district-respondent-113312","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":32,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"},{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":4,"source":"text","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed86648:undated","opinionId":"b829f49b-8ea0-5389-bcb0-b4d7752b55e7","slug":"donald-rudd-et-al-appellant-v-metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-district-respon-d86648","caseName":"Donald Rudd, et al., Appellant v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED86648","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":null,"year":2006,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=16053","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/donald-rudd-et-al-appellant-v-metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-district-respon-d86648","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed88123:undated","opinionId":"06e22668-a1d2-59d5-bec1-defa15f1c1e8","slug":"union-electric-co-dba-ameren-ue-respondent-v-metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-d88123","caseName":"Union Electric Co., d/b/a Ameren UE, Respondent v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED88123","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":null,"year":2007,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=16005","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/union-electric-co-dba-ameren-ue-respondent-v-metropolitan-st-louis-sewer-d88123","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"appellant"}]}