{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"midtown-home-improvements-inc","displayName":"Midtown Home Improvements, Inc.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed106721:2019-03-05","opinionId":"ccc2e8cd-1f87-5957-bcbc-1e5f2b1fd13f","slug":"midtown-home-improvements-inc-respondent-v-antoinette-taylor-appellant-106721","caseName":"Midtown Home Improvements, Inc., Respondent, vs. Antoinette Taylor, Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED106721","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2019-03-05","year":2019,"display_summary":"Antoinette Taylor appealed pro se from a trial court judgment in favor of Midtown Home Improvements, Inc., for the balance due on a home exterior work contract. The appellate court dismissed Taylor's appeal, finding her brief substantially failed to comply with Rule 84.04 of the Missouri Rules of Appellate Procedure, thus preserving no claims for review. The court also granted Midtown's motion for attorney's fees incurred on appeal, as authorized by the contract between the parties.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","civil-procedure","contracts","other"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=137517","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/midtown-home-improvements-inc-respondent-v-antoinette-taylor-appellant-106721","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":16,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: contracts","text: contract"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}