{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"missouri-ethics-commission","displayName":"Missouri Ethics Commission","totalCases":9},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd80176:2017-07-18","opinionId":"1ab7fc10-7c20-5305-858f-687799e84bc4","slug":"state-of-missouri-ex-rel-ron-calzone-v-missouri-ethics-commission-d80176","caseName":"State of Missouri, ex rel., Ron Calzone\nvs.\nMissouri Ethics Commission","caseNumber":"WD80176","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2017-07-18","year":2017,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=114960","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-ex-rel-ron-calzone-v-missouri-ethics-commission-d80176","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed103968:2016-10-25","opinionId":"dcae1c11-39d2-5bbb-8c81-789358295747","slug":"missouri-ethics-commission-appellant-v-yolonda-fountain-henderson-respond-103968","caseName":"Missouri Ethics Commission, Appellant, vs. Yolonda Fountain-Henderson, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED103968","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2016-10-25","year":2016,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"reversed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=106781","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/missouri-ethics-commission-appellant-v-yolonda-fountain-henderson-respond-103968","relatedPracticeAreas":[],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:doc-17790:undated","opinionId":"89825e2e-91eb-5c75-a3bb-268fd339d04c","slug":"missouri-ethics-commission-appellant-v-scott-e-thomas-respondent-17790","caseName":"Missouri Ethics Commission, Appellant, v. Scott E. Thomas, Respondent.","caseNumber":null,"court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":1997,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"reversed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17790","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/missouri-ethics-commission-appellant-v-scott-e-thomas-respondent-17790","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:doc-18080:undated","opinionId":"929a638e-74eb-598e-9716-6dd3f59626d6","slug":"missouri-ethics-commission-respondent-v-ronald-s-wilson-appellant-18080","caseName":"Missouri Ethics Commission, Respondent, v. Ronald S. Wilson, Appellant.","caseNumber":null,"court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":1997,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=18080","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/missouri-ethics-commission-respondent-v-ronald-s-wilson-appellant-18080","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:doc-18645:undated","opinionId":"67eb55e8-49d5-530e-8adf-2a902910d1fe","slug":"missouri-ethics-commission-appellant-v-ernest-a-cornford-respondent-18645","caseName":"Missouri Ethics Commission, Appellant, v. Ernest A. Cornford, Respondent.","caseNumber":null,"court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":1997,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=18645","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/missouri-ethics-commission-appellant-v-ernest-a-cornford-respondent-18645","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd84233:undated","opinionId":"99be44ab-1c69-5665-bde4-3d1695eb4f82","slug":"missouri-ethics-commission-v-philip-levota-d84233","caseName":"Missouri Ethics Commission\nvs. \nPhilip Levota","caseNumber":"WD84233","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2021,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=182577","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/missouri-ethics-commission-v-philip-levota-d84233","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd87716:undated","opinionId":"4b49371d-e28b-5dcb-8916-63444fff1054","slug":"david-j-harris-v-missouri-ethics-commission-d87716","caseName":"David J. Harris\nvs. \nMissouri Ethics Commission","caseNumber":"WD87716","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2025,"display_summary":"David J. Harris appealed the circuit court's judgment which dismissed his petition for review, finding he lacked standing to challenge the Missouri Ethics Commission's (MEC) dismissal of a complaint. Harris had alleged the MEC used an improper legal standard when evaluating his complaint regarding the use of public funds for a ballot measure. The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, holding that Harris failed to demonstrate that the MEC's dismissal directly affected his private legal rights, duties, or privileges, which is a prerequisite for standing under Section 536.150.","primaryTopic":"administrative-law","topicSlugs":["administrative-law","civil-procedure","appellate-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=226095","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/david-j-harris-v-missouri-ethics-commission-d87716","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"mo:sc95796:undated","opinionId":"b0a1ae7a-178a-5dd1-8bd2-dec024055f72","slug":"robin-wright-jones-and-wright-jones-for-senate-appellants-v-missouri-ethi-c95796","caseName":"Robin Wright-Jones, and Wright-Jones for Senate, Appellants, vs. Missouri Ethics Commission, Respondent.","caseNumber":"SC95796","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":null,"year":2018,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=122716","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/robin-wright-jones-and-wright-jones-for-senate-appellants-v-missouri-ethi-c95796","relatedPracticeAreas":[],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed94916:undated","opinionId":"a1302ce5-312f-5c35-9bc4-ec5cb45d4e25","slug":"richard-a-gartner-respondent-v-missouri-ethics-commission-appellant-and-r-d94916","caseName":"Richard A. Gartner, Respondent, v. Missouri Ethics Commission, Appellant and Richard Chrismer, as Director of St. Charles County Election Authority, and Ruth Miller, as County Clerk, Respondents.","caseNumber":"ED94916","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":null,"year":2010,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=41023","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/richard-a-gartner-respondent-v-missouri-ethics-commission-appellant-and-r-d94916","relatedPracticeAreas":[],"role":"appellant"}]}